Florida Justice Reform Institute
- Phone
(850) 222-0170
- Hours of Operation
Monday – Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.
- Address
210 S Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL 32301
Opinion
DON BROWN: Inaccuracy in damages a problem in Florida
By Don Brown | Guest columnist
Posted Dec 16, 2018 at 6:00 AM
No doubt, Florida has its fair share of litigious problems. We are, after all, one of the nation’s most notorious “Judicial Hellholes” according to the American Tort Reform Foundation. Just recently, Florida was ranked number two on their 2018-2019 list, namely for assignment of benefits abuse and expansion of medical liability.
However, one of the worst judicial plagues facing our state is the persistent over-inflation of medical damages. As explained by the Florida Justice Reform Institute, medical providers typically bill for much more than what they are actually willing to accept in payment, therefore resulting in medical invoices that exceed the real costs of treatment. In the courtroom, plaintiffs only present to the jury a cost summary of medical expenses billed rather than the amount paid, which results in a vicious cycle of over-inflation of medical damages awarded.
Furthermore, these inflated costs are exacerbated by the fact that Florida prohibits juries from seeing the payments made to plaintiffs by outside parties such as insurance companies. In simple terms, when juries are making decisions regarding damages, they are unable to properly consider the compensation the plaintiff has already received. As a result, the plaintiff is commonly compensated twice for the same damage.
William Large, with the Florida Justice Reform Institute, also points out that letters of protection can be used to grossly misrepresent the real costs of a procedure. Letters of protection are used by insurance companies to show doctors a certain amount they will be payed once a court verdict is handed down.
This is a problem because insurers will often pledge amounts that are far beyond actual costs. For example, in one case, a letter of protection promised a payment of $100,000 for a $30,000 medical service. When medical costs are presented to a jury, they only see the inflated amounts that are outlined in the letter of protection.
Another factor to consider is that letters of protection are intended to reflect only past medical expenses. Juries also consider the potential for future expenses when making their decisions. Consequently, not only will compensation for past expenses be inflated, but the compensation for anticipated future expenses will be exaggerated as well.
Unfortunately, the Florida Legislature has failed to adequately address this problem when presented the opportunity to do so. In the past, legislation filed to deal with this issue of over-inflated medical damages almost always dies in a Committee before it ever makes it to the Floor for a vote. The Legislature must take action to solve this dilemma before it gets worse.
The first, and most obvious solution, is to allow juries to see any outside compensation received by the plaintiff for treatment. This alone could save large sums of money as plaintiffs would no longer be compensated twice for the same services by both insurance companies and defendants dealing with noneconomic damages.
Another crucial element would be to prohibit the submission of any bills to the jury that do not reflect the amount actually paid by a plaintiff after they receive related outside compensation. The current process seriously misleads juries and wrongly harms defendants. If the amount actually expended by the plaintiff was properly presented, compensation awarded by a jury would better reflect the appropriate and fair cost of damages. Of course, simply disallowing the submission of billed amounts and mandating only the amounts paid would avoid confusion from the onset.
It is evident that Florida is in dire need of lawsuit reform, especially when it comes to accuracy in medical damages and the gross over-inflation of medical expenses. Our legal system is responsible for keeping fairness and justice a top priority because, without it, Florida businesses will continue to suffer.
Don Brown is a resident of DeFuniak Springs and a former member of the Florida House of Representatives.
https://www.nwfdailynews.com/news/20181216/don-brown-inaccuracy-in-damages-problem-in-florida
Lawsuit reform could be major issue for DeSantis and legislature
By David Bishop -December 14, 2018
The Florida Legislature already has a plate full of meaty issues for the upcoming 2019 session. There’s one though that may have the biggest impact on the state’s economy — lawsuit reform. Despite two decades of Republican-control of state government, Florida’s civil legal system is decidedly weighed in favor of trial lawyers. A study released last week by the American Tort Reform Foundation listed Florida as the second ranked “judicial hellhole” in the country only behind California.
How is this possible, you ask? It’s a combination of factors but first and foremost is the Florida Supreme Court. Four of the court’s 7 members are considered liberal and tend to side with the trial lawyer industry. That four judge majority has overturned legislative-created laws that were meant to provide better balance in civil lawsuits.
All that, however, will soon change. Florida’s Constitution mandates that once a judge turns 70, he or she must retire. That impacts 3 of the 4 liberal judges on the State Supreme Court. When Governor-elect Ron DeSantis takes office on January 8, he’ll immediately have three vacancies to fill. During the campaign, he promised to appoint more conservative judges. Once those appointments are made, the state high court will lean decisively to the right, clearing the way for the legislature to pass meaningful reform.
“It gives you a chance to put people on the court who understand the separation of powers, who understand that the job of the judge is not to legislate but to apply the law,” said Gov.-elect DeSantis. “If the legislature is enacting reforms your job is to apply that law, not to rewrite it because your disagree with it.”
DeSantis’ three appointments are significant. In the first weeks of his administration, he will match the number of appointments Governors Jeb Bush and Rick Scott had in the combined 16 years they served.
The issue, however, doesn’t rest solely with the Florida Supreme Court. The legislature, in particular the Senate, has provided stumbling blocks along the way. The House has always complained that its conservative reforms tend to die in the more moderate Senate.
With a more conservative Senate and new governor committed to substantive tort reform, 2019 could be the year the legislature gets something done.
“Change is in the air. We look forward to working with new legislative leadership and a new administration to enact important civil justice reforms on issues like assignment of benefits, truth in damages, and bad faith,” said William Large, president of the Florida Justice Reform Institute.
So how is the average Floridian impacted by the state’s currently tilted civil justice system? Judicial and legislative failures cost most of us money.
Automobile insurance is one of the major problems. Florida has some of the highest car insurance rates in the country. Why? Trial lawyers have prevented the legislature from passing reforms in the “no fault” system of personal injury protection (PIP) automobile insurance coverage.
Assignment of Benefits (AOB) is another money sucker. AOB was meant to speed up repairs, for example with non-storm water damage claims. But there’s a loophole in the law. Lawyers and contractors have found a way to run-up costs and force insurance companies to pay for unneeded repairs. Instead of fighting the claims in court, insurance companies are forced to pay them. Those insurance companies then pass that added cost onto the consumer. A legislative bill that would have fixed this problem didn’t pass in the 2018 legislative session.
Political Miscalculations?
Another sign the political tide could be turning against trial lawyers came in the 2018 election cycle. When Republicans took control of state government in 1998, the trial lawyers knew they had to rebuild their political influence. They turned their sights on the moderate state Senate and began recruiting and contributing to candidates who supported them on their issues. And they’ve had success. For instance, the most recent legislative presiding officers, Senate President Joe Negron and House Speaker Richard Corcoran, both attorneys, supported the trial bar. Their two-year reign in office prevented the passage of civil law reforms.
In 2018, trial lawyers – believing the Democrats had a chance to take control of the Florida Senate – returned to their base and set their sites on two Republican candidates: incumbent Senator Dana Young and Senate candidate Manny Diaz. Trial lawyers invested heavily in Young’s opponent, Representative Janet Cruz, who narrowly defeated Young for the Tampa seat. Diaz won his Miami-Dade Senate seat, but not before the Senate Republican Committee had to spend more than they intended to keep the seat in GOP hands.
What’s Next?
In the House, new Speaker Jose Oliva will likely lead the passage of civil legal reforms and Republicans in the Senate may finally have the appetite to weaken the trial lawyers’ grip on the upper chamber – whether it be for political revenge or good public policy.
Sources says Senate President Bill Galvano has an interest in addressing tort reform and particularly wants to look at Assignment of Benefits, PIP and Workers’ Compensation.
Business groups, which largely financed Republican reelection campaigns and committees, now wait to see if proposed reforms are just more talk or if 2019 is the year Floridians may finally see some action.
http://www.flanewsonline.com/lawsuit-reform-could-be-major-issue-for-desantis-and-legislature/
Six of the top 10 auto glass lawyers are in Tampa Bay
Last year there were 24,000 court cases involving auto glass. Six of the 10 lawyers who brought the bulk of those cases are in Tampa Bay.
Lawsuits over the fair repair price for a windshield are growing in Tampa Bay,
and just a small handful of lawyers andles the bulk of them.
Pictured is a broken windshield in 2015. [WILL VRAGOVIC | TIMES, 2015]
By Malena Carollo
December 13, 2018
In Tampa Bay, the cost of replacing a broken windshield isn’t just parts and labor — increasingly, it also includes legal fees. The bay area is ground-zero for lawsuits brought by auto glass repair companies against insurers over the fair price of a windshield repair.
It’s also home to the surprisingly small group facilitating this proliferation.
Last year, companies with “glass” or “windshield” in their name brought 24,000 lawsuits against insurers, according to a database maintained by the Florida Department of Financial Services. About 76 percent of that caseload was brought by just 10 lawyers. Six of them are based in the Tampa Bay area.
“We’re fighting for the average glass shops out there trying to keep them in business,” said Ron Haynes, a lawyer based in Tampa.
Haynes had the third-highest number of cases in the state last year (2,465). He was the only one of the six Tampa Bay lawyers who agreed to talk with the Tampa Bay Times about their role in these disputes.
He and the other five litigate what are known as “assignment of benefits” cases for auto glass replacements. His clients are small- and medium-sized auto glass companies both in and out of network with insurers. They either seek out or are hired by drivers with damaged windshields.
Windshield repairs are free for Florida drivers, who can sign over their legal right to talk with their insurer to the repair company so the two can settle billing.
Lawyers come into the picture when the insurer and repair company disagree on the repair price. The auto glass companies sue to get what they consider a fair rate. For Haynes’ clients, that is the recommended National Auto Glass Specifications rate.
But insurers often don’t want to pay that, Haynes said.
“Unfortunately, insurance companies are taking a strong position on auto glass in terms of claim payment,” Haynes said. “They’re really insisting that everybody replace auto glass at a significant discount.”
Insurers say the end goal for the lawyers and repair companies isn’t a fair rate — it’s getting to a courtroom.
“The explanation for the relatively high number of lawsuits over relatively small dollar amounts is an incentive to make money,” said Michael Carlson, president of the Personal Insurance Federation of Florida, a trade group of major home and auto insurance companies in the state.
That incentive, Carlson said, is that under state law, the insured driver’s legal fees are paid if they win. Since the driver signed over their legal rights to the repair company, the company’s lawyer collects those fees. According to William Large, president of the Florida Justice Reform Institute, that provision is meant to even the playing field for regular consumers who must go up against well-funded companies in court.
“It’s not meant to benefit a third-party corporate vendor,” Large said. The institute regularly advocates against the lawyer fee statute, citing it as the reason for the proliferation of lawsuits.
The lawsuits began picking up around 2013, jumping from just 1,389 in 2012, according to the Florida Department of Financial Services.
The dispute isn’t just insider baseball. Because the repair companies are acting on the drivers’ behalf, the driver is named as a plaintiff in the lawsuit. The real-world consequences for drivers are that their rates can go up if their insurer decides the lawsuit makes them a riskier customer.
Haynes, the Tampa lawyer, said it is tantamount to bullying and discourages people from pursuing a legitimate legal grievance.
“That’s once again an attempt to intimidate and villainize assignment of benefits,” he said. “Rates shouldn’t go up at all.”
There isn’t consensus on a workable compromise. Insurers argue that having to pay the attorney fee is the issue. But Bill Newton, deputy director of the Florida Consumer Action Network, said any solution needs to preserve consumers’ rights — in this case, to have their legal fees paid if they challenge an insurer.
“It gives consumers access to the courts,” Newton said. “Without that, we have no access.”
Contact Malena Carollo at [email protected] or (727) 892-2249. Follow @malenacarollo.
Top auto glass lawyers in Tampa Bay for 2017
• Anthony T. Prieto, Tampa: 2,849 cases, No. 2 in Florida
• Ron Haynes, Tampa: 2,465 cases, No. 3 in Florida
• Marc Nussbaum, St. Petersburg: 1,399 cases, No. 6 in Florida
• Christopher Calkin, Tampa: 1,161 cases, No. 7 in Florida
• Jason Lamoureux, Brandon: 946 cases, No. 8 in Florida
• Lee Davis, Clearwater: 847 cases, No. 9 in Florida
https://www.tampabay.com/business/six-of-the-top-10-auto-glass-lawyers-are-in-tampa-bay-20181213/
(850) 222-0170
Monday – Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.
210 S Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL 32301